Thursday, June 15, 2006

June 15 2006

I am not sure what this will be about, but I felt like adding to the blog. That "church shopping" entry is getting old. I am taking it pretty easy these days, probably more than I should be. I have some work to do this summer, reading five books and writing a paper on my philosophy of education. I have no clue. I wanted to take a class this summer, but I could not afford it. Maybe I should not have bought that television and ordered digital cable, but I probably won't be saying that when the Tour de France is on every day next month. I also need to prepare curriculum for next school year, and I have not started on that yet. I will be teaching Genesis through Ruth and the life of Paul, which I am hoping to turn into Acts-Revelation. I need so much time to prepare for these things.

Today I was planning to do some editing on Justin Griffin's paper/book, but I ran out of time. I went and played disc golf with Thomas at Winthrop Lake. I shot 66 last time, but 75 or 76 this time. We played with a guy named Kenneth, who was better than us, with a full bag of discs.
What I was really looking forward to was riding bike with the group led by Carl from a church on the road to York. It was a good ride, but there was more traffic and more dogs than are fun to deal with. But I guess that keeps it interesting. One dog almost ran right into my front wheel. After the halfway point, three of us rode off the front, and were cruising right along, kind of trading turns at the front. The other guys' names were Rick and Hans. They were both a little faster than me, when it came down to a hill after 5 or so miles, and the hard part to take is that they were both at least 20 years older than I, Hans probably 40 years older than I am. But he is Dutch, so I guess being good at riding a bike is in his blood, right? I rode out to the meeting place, and back, so the ride wound up as 67 kilometers for me, in 2 hours, 18 minutes. Not bad, considering all the stop signs and regroupings, and considering my legs were sore from playing soccer Tuesday night in my too small cleats.

I am listening to John Piper's biographical message on Adoniram Judson, and he is throwing it down! I wish I had the spiritual and theological balls that he has. Yes, I said that. He is talking about the invincible purpose of God to spread the gospel of the glory of Christ among all nations and result in churches that bring cultures to obedience to King Jesus. And God's plan to bring this about through the sufferings of his ministers, like Adoniram Judson, like Paul, and like Jesus for that matter.

I am often thinking about whether the Christian faith is so doctrinal, authoritative, and absolute truth-based, when I read the growing testimony and thinking of post-modern minded believers. I definitely lean toward thinking it is absolute and unchanging, the "faith that was once for all delivered to the saints," which Jude tells us "contend for" (1:3). The thing that makes me second guess it is the often persuasive arguments and perspectives of those who claim that Christ and the faith are opposed to much of the dogmatizing in the history of Christianity. The latest thing that has me thinking this is a comment in the blog http://polyesterpixiesundertheprayerrug.blogspot.com/, about literalism, from May 30. I met d. in the Orchard, the fan community of Over the Rhine. Another source that has me thinking along such lines is the book The Last Word: Beyond the Bible Wars to a New Understanding of the Authority of Scripture, by N.T. Wright, Bishop of Durham, and former professor of New Testament at Oxford or Cambridge. His basic point is that Scripture has historically, when understood correctly, functioned authoritatively in the church not as a sourcebook for prooftexts for doctrinal disputes, but as the story that orders our lives and mission in the church. That means for today that we are to be about God's work in the world of proclaiming redemption in Christ that will ultimately result in the renewal of all things, which is about what he says in the book. I agree with that for the most part, but I think it can result in vagueness, and that the Bible gives us more details than that, frankly. I think we need to believe those things too.

Piper just told the story about Judson's conversion and encounters with Jacob Eames(sp?). INCREDIBLE stuff. Wow!

I have been pondering the relationship of the teaching and examples in the later parts of the canon of the Hebrew Scriptures and the religious situation of Judaism at the time of Christ. I started thinking about this, I guess, when I questioned the practice of the "See you at the pole" prayer event at our school (and many schools across the nation) that happens every fall. It is an event that encourages students to pray around the flagpoles in front of their schools. The reason I questioned the practice is because it seems that prayer is performed in front of the flagpole in order for people passing by to see it. I asked whether this was a reason we are told to pray in the Bible, and I read to my students what Jesus said in Matthew 6:5-6, "And when you pray, you must not be like the hypocrites. For they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and at the street corners, that they may be seen by others. Truly, I say to you, they have received their reward. 6But when you pray, go into your room and shut the door and pray to your Father who is in secret. And your Father who sees in secret will reward you." I know the flagpole event does not (hopefully) encourage public prayer for self-righteous attention-getting, but rather example-setting. But I wonder whether prayer is supposed to be for setting an example and making a statement. One of my students protested, "But Daniel prayed in front of his open window where people could see him." She and the other members of the student government had just heard teaching on this from one of the other Bible teachers on a weekend retreat. I am so glad she said that, and that one of my other students (when I continually questioned the practice), said I was only looking at the negative side of things, ignoring the good that could come from such public prayer.

When I thought of the example of Daniel (Daniel 6), I considered that maybe the practice of pious Jews praying in public started when the Jewish exiles, or returnees, heard the story about Daniel standing up for what was right publicly, and in an effort to follow that righteous example, the practice slowly degenerated into self-righteous spiritual swagger. Perhaps it ended up with Pharisees in the time of Christ doing things like this:

10"Two men went up into the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. 11The Pharisee, standing by himself, prayed (or "standing, prayed to himself") thus: 'God, I thank you that I am not like other men, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector. 12I fast twice a week; I give tithes of all that I get.'"
I have been thinking this especially since I read through Chronicles, which was traditionally believed to have been written by Ezra, I think. I have been using the book The Literary Structure of the Old Testament by David Dorsey, to help me understand how the books fit together. His analysis highlights sections that talk about the central role of the Priests and Levites in the history of Israel and Judah, particularly, as an encouragement (supposedly) to the Jews returning from exile to support the work of rebuilding the temple and establishing the worship led by the Priests and Levites. Did that lead to the exaltation of Jewish religious leaders so that by the time of Jesus, they wielded excessive authority over the Jewish people? More on that later.

Sunday, February 26, 2006

Church shopping

I have always kind of prided myself on not being having a consumer mindset when it comes to churches and which one I am part of. Over the past few months, however, I have realized that it is only because I have been part of the same church all my 27 years. I moved to Rock Hill, SC from Columbia last August, and since then I have been looking around for a church to be part of. Most Sundays I have been to Westminster Presbyterian, which is connected with the school I work for and where many of my students attend. I like the church, and felt welcomed by the people there when I first attended. I am frequently encouraged and challenged by the preaching, and the music is very well done in both contemporary and traditional services. The reason I have not joined is because I would like to look around and experiment with other styles and traditions to see if I might find a place where I can thrive more than in the Presbyterian setting I am used to. Also, I would prefer to be part of a group that is not so big; Westminster has close to 2000 members. I also prefer traditional worship, and to attend the class for single adults I have to worship in the contemporary service.
So far, my efforts to look around at other churches have not been very successful or profitable. For a while toward the end of the calendar year, I was not even waking up in time Sunday mornings to make it to church. Since then, I have attended First Baptist, Christ Episcopal in Charlotte, and today I went to First Associate Reformed Presbyterian downtown. I appreciated things about all of those, and the Sunday School at First Baptist seemed extremely vibrant and active, but I did not quite fit in any of those others, sometimes because I was not wearing a jacket (and I don't own one). I guess my desire for traditional worship will have to wait until my budget will allow me such highbrow tastes.
If I could be totally consumerish about it, I would probably go to the Sovereign Grace ministries group up in north Charlotte, because I think I agree with their beliefs and practices more than anyone else, and I imagine I would be challenged to grow in my faith there in a way that would be meaningful and persuasive to me more than anywhere else. That group combines reformed theology with charismatic freedom and expression in worship, which sometimes makes me uncomfortable, but I think it is how it is supposed to be. The reason I do not attend there is because it is a 30 minute or more drive, and I can't justify that ecologically, and my car would probably break down sooner with that kind of weekly driving. I also attended a Christmas music presentation at an Evangelical Free church in Charlotte, but I have not been there on Sunday morning yet.
I would still like to, and have said that I would, attend Christ Ridge Presbyterian, where one of my students' dad is pastor, and I have heard the big Belcher is there sometimes. Also the Free Methodist church that is across the street, and West End, where many of my students attend. I would also like to go back and be present for a complete service at Ebenezer Presbyterian, where my roommate is youth pastor. This process has definitely helped me tone down some of my narrow beliefs that have shaky biblical grounds, and look for the beliefs I have in common with other traditions.

Tuesday, January 31, 2006

Waiting for God

I have been teaching my students Psalm 130 for the past few weeks, and a question that I suppose I have always had has arisen. Is God's forgiveness something we have to wait for? The Psalm says:


A Song of Ascents.
1 Out of the depths I cry to you, O LORD!
2 O Lord, hear my voice!Let your ears be attentive to the voice of my pleas for mercy!
3 If you, O LORD, should mark iniquities, O Lord, who could stand?
4 But with you there is forgiveness, that you may be feared.
5 I wait for the LORD, my soul waits, and in his word I hope;
6 my soul waits for the Lord more than watchmen for the morning, more than watchmen for the morning.
7 O Israel, hope in the LORD! For with the LORD there is steadfast love, and with him is plentiful redemption.
8 And he will redeem Israel from all his iniquities.

After the psalmist acknowledges that there is forgiveness with God, he says that he waits for God. What is he waiting for? I guess this has long been a concept I don't really understand. What does it mean to wait for God? I don't think it is referring to His coming, as in the advent of the Messiah, or the second coming of Christ. The context seems to suggest that it is expecting and looking forward to God's working in our lives and souls, and specifically forgiving our sins. But I have usually thought of forgiveness as an instantaneous thing, that we confess and are forgiven and can move on. Perhaps the Roman Catholic teaching of penance is more in accord with this.

I know this was an important passage for Luther, and he even wrote a hymn about it, but I do not have access to his commentaries or lectures on Psalms. I have also heard that John Owen wrote 320 pages on this Psalm, and he was anything but Catholic. I gave this question to my students today as a journal entry, but I was afraid to open it up to much discussion because I am still so confused about it myself and I am somewhat afraid to make myself and the students vulnerable. I need to open up more to the Spirit in my teaching. I also realized my own tendency to question church practices that I do not like, as today I was questioning the emphasis on quick decisions for Christ and simple presentations of the gospel. I ought to be quicker to question my own actions and practices.